Had to feel a bit for the Knights today. I thought they played pretty well today, even though our starting forward pack was out as well as our halfback.
They played the conditions and the team in front of them, kept our backs busy and made us turn the ball out a lot from our 20m zone.
Then Mitch Barnett pretty much sealed the teams fate just before half time. It was going to be uphill battle for them, even though it seemed we had ‘clocked off’ a little in defence that second half, I didn’t think the result was in question.
Would the Knights have won if the matchup was 13 v 13? Maybe… Maybe not, but we will never know.
Barnett was a clear dog with that cheap shot. He will be missing a lot of football in his future.
The attacking combination of Tago and May was brilliant. I wouldn’t be surprised to see To’o moved back to the right wing to Partner with Crichton at some stage.
They still have a bit to work on in defence, but they could have had 7 tries between them yesterday.
I was not too sure about this game in the leadup, and was hoping we could get a win with an understrength lineup.
The boys all gave it their best & got a good win in the end. Yeo & Edwards held the inexperienced team together and we got the job done, despite a few defensive lapses & again too many errors.
My biggest concern is with the officiating. At full strength we can mostly overcome the vagaries/inconsistencies of the officials, but with players missing it becomes a lot harder.
I hope that dope ‘doctor’ in the bunker is not a ‘telehealth’ doctor as there will be a few deaths from his work.
Bank the 2 points and move ahead.
Barnett has been referred directly to the Judiciary to make his case in front of them.
He hasn’t been charged so there are no guidelines as such, the penalty imposed is to be determined by the judiciary
I suspect he will get a minimum of 6 weeks and could see as much as 8
I believe Smith is ok and hope he is, he was going ok and Barnetts hit was as cheap as you get .
The NRL have 2 imperatives at play in reviewing his case.
1…was the incident itself and its been such a long time we have seen a cheap shot, last precedent would be Mitchell on Manu last year
2…the NRL have been going out of their way to stamp out foul play where it impacts a players head
Largely to reduce litigation opportunities in the years ahead.
Without raising the bias issue in regards to Mitchell, i feel Barnett maybe the sacrificial lamb so to speak in being the poster boy for the NRL in this is what you will get if you do this.
Mind you he deserves a long stint IMO and wouldn’t surprise me if he got 10 to 12 weeks
The opinions expressed on Panther Pride are not necessarilly those of the sites owners.
Panther Pirde or Recycled Pixel accept no responsibility for articles presented, their ownership or implications of ownership.
Panther Pride accepts no responsibility for inadvertant copyright breaches. This website does not have any affiliation with the National Rugby League (NRL). or the Penrith Panthers Rugby League Football Club,
nor business connection and has not been endorsed by the National Rugby League or Penrith Panthers.